Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Habeas Corpus in WartimeFrom the Tower of London to Guantanamo Bay$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Amanda L. Tyler

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780199856664

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2017

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199856664.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 17 July 2019

World War II

World War II

Suspension and Martial Law in Hawaii and Mass Detention of Japanese Americans on the Mainland

Chapter:
(p.211) 10 World War II
Source:
Habeas Corpus in Wartime
Author(s):

Amanda L. Tyler

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780199856664.003.0011

The bombing of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, ushered the United States into World War II. Within hours, and suspension and martial law came to rule the Hawaiian Territory. On the mainland, the military imposed curfews, designated huge portions of the western United States to be military areas of exclusion, and ultimately created “relocation centers” across the west to detain over 120,000 persons of Japanese ancestry, including over 70,000 citizens. As this chapter explores, in the face of serious constitutional questions about the propriety of martial law, internment of citizens, and military trials of civilians, constitutional considerations generally gave way to war hysteria. But, as many key government actors recognized at the time, the detention of Japanese American citizens violated the Suspension Clause, standing as it did at odds with the entire history of the Clause. As challenges to the relevant military policies spilled over into the courts, the institution arguably best situated to identify and highlight their constitutional infirmities—the Supreme Court—never did so, leaving this episode standing as both a dangerous and deeply problematic precedent in American constitutional history.

Keywords:   Ex parte Endo, Japanese American internment, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, World War II, Suspension Clause

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .