Truth, Destiny, and the Co-Existential Analytic
In this chapter Rajan contends that it is not enough to oppose modern universalism by positing a culture’s specificity in contradistinction to it. Universalism can only be countered by universalism, asserts Rajan, and argues that the underlying logic of ‘progress’ in today’s global ideology is still broadly Hegelian. The central question raised in the paper is: is this the only universal story that can be told? Rajan answers this question with a resounding NO! by pointing to an unlikely source: the meta-philosophical logic of the autonomous development of Indian philosophy which emerges when the Indian dialectician T.R.V. Murti and the Japanese philosopher Gadjin Nagao are read together. Rajan christens the unfolding of this logic in a social landscape of intercommunality as ‘backwater ecsatsis’, and argues that it is only in such ecstasis that an alternative to the failed Hegelian conception of the state as the crowning accomplishment of human community is to be found.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.