Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Governance IndicatorsApproaches, Progress, Promise$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Helmut K. Anheier, Matthias Haber, and Mark A. Kayser

Print publication date: 2018

Print ISBN-13: 9780198817062

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2018

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198817062.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 22 October 2019

Innovations in Objectively Measuring Corruption in Public Procurement

Innovations in Objectively Measuring Corruption in Public Procurement

Chapter:
(p.154) 7 Innovations in Objectively Measuring Corruption in Public Procurement
Source:
Governance Indicators
Author(s):

Mihály Fazekas

Luciana Cingolani

Bence Tóth

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780198817062.003.0007

While there is continued interest in measuring governance, disagreement on how best to do so has only grown over time. To provide pointers at innovative and rigorous indicator building, this chapter documents innovations in measuring a particularly challenging governance dimension: corruption in public procurement. In hopes of inspiring future research, the chapter critically reviews objective corruption proxies using administrative data on government purchases falling in four broad categories: tendering risk indicators, political connections indicators, supplier risk indicators, and contracting body risk indicators. The findings indicate that the best measurement instruments focus on the transaction level (micro level) while allowing for consistent aggregations for time series and cross-country comparisons. Such actionable indicators capture behaviour as directly as possible rather than remaining at the country level. They also retain the relational or transactional aspects of governance, revealing a much more dynamic picture than widely used population and expert surveys.

Keywords:   governance, measurement, corruption, risk, objective indicator, big data in social science, administrative data

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .