Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
When Human Rights Clash at the European Court of Human RightsConflict or Harmony?$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Stijn Smet and Eva Brems

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780198795957

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: August 2017

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198795957.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 06 July 2020

Conflicts between Human Rights and the ECtHR

Conflicts between Human Rights and the ECtHR

Towards a Structured Balancing Test

Chapter:
(p.38) 2 Conflicts between Human Rights and the ECtHR
Source:
When Human Rights Clash at the European Court of Human Rights
Author(s):

Stijn Smet

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780198795957.003.0003

This chapter proposes a structured balancing test for the resolution of human rights conflicts. The chapter first critiques the European Court of Human Right’s ad hoc balancing approach to human rights conflicts. Analysis of a pair of concrete judgments—Obst v. Germany and Schüth v. Germany—illustrates the shortcomings of that approach. The chapter then proposes an alternative, structured balancing test. The structured balancing test, composed of a limited set of seven balancing criteria, relies on comparison of the relative strength of reasons in favour of conflicting human rights to determine which right should prevail in a given conflict. By doing away with contested balancing notions, such as ‘weight’ and ‘scales’, the structured balancing test also aims to overcome the incommensurability challenge to balancing. The test is finally applied to Obst and Schüth to illustrate how its use could improve the Court’s adjudicatory practice.

Keywords:   conflicts of rights, human rights conflict, European Court of Human Rights, ECtHR, ad hoc balancing, structured balancing, balancing as reasoning, nets of reasons, incommensurability

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .