Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Global Justice, Natural Resources, and Climate Change$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Megan Blomfield

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9780198791737

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2019

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198791737.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 20 February 2020

Against Equal Division of Natural Resources

Against Equal Division of Natural Resources

Chapter:
(p.62) 4 Against Equal Division of Natural Resources
Source:
Global Justice, Natural Resources, and Climate Change
Author(s):

Megan Blomfield

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780198791737.003.0004

This chapter rejects Equal Division, focusing on Hillel Steiner’s formulation of the view. First, further explanation of why one might take Equal Division to follow from Equal Original Claims is provided. Then, David Miller’s objection is introduced, according to which there is no defensible metric by which resource shares can be made commensurate, given the fact of reasonable value pluralism. The chapter argues that what the metric problem really shows, is that Equal Division possesses insufficient impartiality to satisfy the equal original claims that motivate the view in the first place. This case is made by critiquing the three principal metrics proposed to amalgamate individual valuations of natural resources and thereby render Equal Division both coherent and defensible; namely, economic value, opportunity cost, and ecological space. The chapter concludes that to respect Equal Original Claims, the better approach will be to formulate a Common Ownership conception of justice for natural resources.

Keywords:   David Miller, ecological space, economic value, Equal Division, Equal Original Claims, Hillel Steiner, impartiality, metric problem, opportunity cost, reasonable value pluralism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .