Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Mountstuart Elphinstone in South AsiaPioneer of British Colonial Rule$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Shah Mahmoud Hanifi

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9780190914400

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2019

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190914400.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 07 December 2019

Muslim ‘Fanaticism’ as Ambiguous Trope

Muslim ‘Fanaticism’ as Ambiguous Trope

A Study in Polemical Mutation

Chapter:
(p.91) 4 Muslim ‘Fanaticism’ as Ambiguous Trope
Source:
Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia
Author(s):

Zak Leonard

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780190914400.003.0005

This chapter is concerned with the phenomenon of "Muslim fanaticism", an amorphous threat to governmental security that resisted colonial scrutiny throughout the nineteenth century. As tensions with borderland tribes, Wahhabi conspirators, and the forces of a global Muslim "revival" mounted, fanaticism evolved into a floating signifier, a malleable construct that could service divergent polemical agendas. Borderland ethnographers and India reformers conceptualized Muslim religiosity in various ways to support their own commentaries on native "political" vitality. Earlier observers like Mountstuart Elphinstone represented Indian communities in gendered terms and downplayed the influence of religious enthusiasm on societal progress. Later ethnographers, however, invoked fanaticism to justify a colonial "Forward Policy", or conversely, attributed Muslim discontent to the state's poorly conceived, westernizing legislation. Meanwhile, reformers who were calling for the retention of princely rule referenced fanaticism to defend the interests of Muslim notables in South India and Bengal. These loyalist leaders, they argued, could help provide native society with an organic trajectory of civic growth and douse the embers of fanaticism whenever they became enflamed. Extending this advocacy of native sovereignty to the Afghan frontier ultimately proved contentious on account of Russian expansionism and the resurgence of the Eastern Question.

Keywords:   Frontier, Fanaticism, Ethnography, India, Reformism, Native Sovereignty

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .