Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE 2016$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Giuliana Ziccardi Capaldo

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780190848194

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2017

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190848194.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 07 April 2020

Normative Inconsistencies in the State System with Special Emphasis on International Law

Normative Inconsistencies in the State System with Special Emphasis on International Law

Chapter:
(p.175) Normative Inconsistencies in the State System with Special Emphasis on International Law
Source:
THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE 2016
Author(s):

Hans Köchler

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780190848194.003.0009

A system of legal norms should be free of contradictions. The idea of justice is incompatible with an erratic interpretation and, subsequently, arbitrary application of norms. Systemic contradictions make actions by state authorities unpredictable. However, at the domestic as well as at the international level, considerations of power and interest have often made of the respective body of norms a “hermeneutical minefield.” The international legal order contains contradictions even between the most basic principles such as state sovereignty, self-determination and the rules of international humanitarian law. While, at the national level, the authority of constitutional courts may help to eliminate contradictions and inconsistencies, there exists, apart from limited regional arrangements, no such separation of powers at the international level. The article analyzes the systemic, destabilizing impact of normative contradictions in exemplary cases related to the interpretation of the UN Charter and the system of international humanitarian and international criminal law.

Keywords:   International Court of Justice, International Criminal Court, jus cogens, national interest, normative contradictions, power politics, rule of law, sovereignty, United Nations

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .