Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
International Relations' Last Synthesis?Decoupling Constructivist and Critical Approaches$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

J. Samuel Barkin and Laura Sjoberg

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9780190463427

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2019

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190463427.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 14 December 2019

Critical Theory Is Ontologically Promiscuous and Methodologically Agnostic

Critical Theory Is Ontologically Promiscuous and Methodologically Agnostic

Chapter:
(p.99) 6 Critical Theory Is Ontologically Promiscuous and Methodologically Agnostic
Source:
International Relations' Last Synthesis?
Author(s):

J. Samuel Barkin

Laura Sjoberg

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780190463427.003.0006

Do critical approaches to International Relations have some ontological commonality? Is there some tenet about what the world is (or should be) that critical approaches share? Does critical International Relations scholarship have methodological, perhaps even constructivist, commonality? This chapter makes the case that critical theories are sets of political commitments, not ontologies or sets of research methods. To read critical theories as ontology or method is to do injustice to their ties to politics; to read critical theories as methodologically bound is unfairly limiting to them. The chapter provides an overview of the range of ontologies and methods that are useful to the spectrum of International Relations critical theories, suggesting that this spectrum is broad, varied, and not necessarily internally consistent. While constructivisms can be methodologically useful to critical theorizing, they are only some among many of the tools that can be employed fruitfully in service of the various ends of International Relations critical theories.

Keywords:   International Relations theory, critical theory, feminism, political theory, ontology, methodology

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .