Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Digital DilemmasPower, Resistance, and the Internet$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

M.I. Franklin

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780199982691

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: February 2015

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199982691.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 17 September 2019

Who Rules in the “Internet Galaxy”? Battle of the Browsers and Beyond

Who Rules in the “Internet Galaxy”? Battle of the Browsers and Beyond

(p.65) 3 Who Rules in the “Internet Galaxy”? Battle of the Browsers and Beyond
Digital Dilemmas

M. I. Franklin

Oxford University Press

In 1998 the US Department of Justice took Microsoft to court, charging it with anticompetitive practices. In 2005 and then in 2007 the corporation finally buried the hatchet with the European Union by granting partial access to its source code. Since then attention had shifted to the power of integrated search engines and social networking sites as the response to desktop-dependent internet uses and applications. In the so-called Web 2.0 settings, Google holds the pole position. Google's hegemonic position in this respect as a global brand that champions “internet freedom” and speaks for younger generations of computer users has put Microsoft on the back foot even as the latter still dominates the global PC and operating systems software market. This chapter reconstructs the Microsoft antitrust case in light of this next generation of power struggles over computer-mediated communications. In both scenarios, corporate moves to enclose the internet indicate a longstanding standoff on the one hand between vested commercial interests where intellectual property rights and security concerns are fundamental working principles and, on the other hand, advocates of a socially inclusive and equitable internet based on nonproprietary software, peer-to-peer exchange, and low-cost access to the web. Each perspective denotes a particular ethos about freedom, regulation, and openness; and each in turn represents a different view of the internet's future.

Keywords:   Microsoft, Google, integrated search engines, internet freedom, antitrust case, intellectual property rights, internet

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .