Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Counterinsurgency LawNew Directions in Asymmetric Warfare$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

William Banks

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199941445

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: April 2015

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199941445.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 12 December 2019

Proportionality in Counterinsurgency

Proportionality in Counterinsurgency

Reconciling Human Rights and Humanitarian Law

Chapter:
(p.24) 2 Proportionality in Counterinsurgency
Source:
Counterinsurgency Law
Author(s):

Evan J. Criddle

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199941445.003.0002

This chapter examines the potential for convergence of human rights law (HRL) and international humanitarian law (IHL) in counterinsurgency (COIN), with particular emphasis on the traditional IHL principle of proportionality. Drawing on a relational theory of lex specialis in place of operational theory, it considers when IHL or HRL doctrines should apply to set the parameters for what is proportionate in COIN. The chapter begins with an overview of the fissures along the “fault line” where IHL and HRL overlap with potentially destabilizing consequences for international law as a normative system. It then describes current approaches for reconciling IHL and HRL before turning to a discussion of the relational theory of the use of force. It also explores the fiduciary character of human rights and of IHL, along with the efforts by international tribunals and publicists to resolve tensions between IHL proportionality and HRL proportionality in COIN. To illustrate the relational theory's application to contemporary COIN operations, the chapter presents a case study from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: the controversial decision of the Supreme Court of Israel in the Targeted Killings case.

Keywords:   human rights law, international humanitarian law, counterinsurgency, proportionality, relational theory, lex specialis, operational theory, use of force, human rights, Israel

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .