Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Among the CreationistsDispatches from the Anti-Evolutionist Frontline$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jason Rosenhouse

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199744633

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2015

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199744633.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 June 2019

Methodological Naturalism

Methodological Naturalism

Chapter:
(p.116) 20 Methodological Naturalism
Source:
Among the Creationists
Author(s):

Jason Rosenhouse

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199744633.003.0020

In this chapter, the author considers philosophical questions about methodological naturalism (MN). Among intelligent design (ID) supporters “science” is commonly understood to refer to the totality of all that is true about nature. That God created the world is certainly part of that truth. Philosophers of science have long discussed the “demarcation problem,” by which they refer to the attempt to draw a clear line between science and other sorts of inquiry. In this regard it has been suggested that science must adhere to the MN principle. It is claimed that although the line between science and nonscience is sometimes blurry, an invocation of supernatural entities nonetheless places you automatically on the wrong side of it. The term “methodological” indicates that naturalistic presumptions are a matter of scientific practice only. The author discusses the arguments of Robert Pennock in defense of MN. He also comments on the conflict between the empirical realities of nature and deeply held notions about God.

Keywords:   methodological naturalism, intelligent design, science, nature, God, demarcation problem, nonscience, Robert Pennock

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .