- Title Pages
- Dedication
- Series Foreword
- Prologue
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Violence, Free Will, and Legal Responsibility
- 2 The Human Brain and Cognition
- 3 The Basics of Neuroimaging
- 4 Neuropsychological Assessment
- 5 The Etiology and Neurobiology of Violence
- 6 Violence and the Adolescent Brain
- 7 The Admissibility of Scientific Evidence
- 8 The Issue of Evidentiary Reliability
- 9 Malingering and its Assessment
- 10 Neuroscience and the Law
- 11 Linking Brain Function and Behavior
- 12 A Cautionary Tale
- References
- Chapter 1. Violence, Free Will, and Legal Responsibility
- Chapter 2. The Human Brain and Cognition
- Chapter 3. The Basics of Neuroimaging
- Chapter 4. Neuropsychological Assessment
- Chapter 5. The Etiology and Neurobiology of Violence
- Chapter 6. Violence and the Adolescent Brain
- Chapter 7. The Admissibility of Scientific Evidence
- Chapter 8. The Issue of Evidentiary Reliability
- Chapter 9. Malingering and its Assessment
- Chapter 10. Neuroscience and the Law
- Chapter 11. Linking Brain Function and Behavior
- Chapter 12. A Cautionary Tale
- Index
The Admissibility of Scientific Evidence
The Admissibility of Scientific Evidence
- Chapter:
- (p.140) 7 The Admissibility of Scientific Evidence
- Source:
- Murder in the Courtroom
- Author(s):
Brigitte Vallabhajosula
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
Although the reality of brain impairment and its effect on judgment is well accepted in the scientific community, how brain dysfunction may have contributed to a particular criminal offense may be open to challenges, particularly with respect to neuroimaging and neuropsychological test results. Clearly if judges and juries seek to rely on brain images and neuropsychological tests to assist them in making, for example, culpability determinations, conclusions based in part or in full on neuroscience evidence must meet pertinent legal standards for the admissibility of scientific evidence. To that end, there are a number of legal rules and guidelines that assist courts in their admissibility determinations (e.g. Federal Rules of Evidence [FRE] 401, 403, 702, Frye General Acceptance Test, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [1993], General Electric Co. v. Joiner [1997], and Kumho Tire Company, Ltd. v. Carmichael [1999]).
Keywords: FRE 401, FRE 403, FRE 702, Frye, Daubert, Joiner, Kumho, scientific evidence
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .
- Title Pages
- Dedication
- Series Foreword
- Prologue
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Violence, Free Will, and Legal Responsibility
- 2 The Human Brain and Cognition
- 3 The Basics of Neuroimaging
- 4 Neuropsychological Assessment
- 5 The Etiology and Neurobiology of Violence
- 6 Violence and the Adolescent Brain
- 7 The Admissibility of Scientific Evidence
- 8 The Issue of Evidentiary Reliability
- 9 Malingering and its Assessment
- 10 Neuroscience and the Law
- 11 Linking Brain Function and Behavior
- 12 A Cautionary Tale
- References
- Chapter 1. Violence, Free Will, and Legal Responsibility
- Chapter 2. The Human Brain and Cognition
- Chapter 3. The Basics of Neuroimaging
- Chapter 4. Neuropsychological Assessment
- Chapter 5. The Etiology and Neurobiology of Violence
- Chapter 6. Violence and the Adolescent Brain
- Chapter 7. The Admissibility of Scientific Evidence
- Chapter 8. The Issue of Evidentiary Reliability
- Chapter 9. Malingering and its Assessment
- Chapter 10. Neuroscience and the Law
- Chapter 11. Linking Brain Function and Behavior
- Chapter 12. A Cautionary Tale
- Index