Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Accountability for KillingMoral Responsibility for Collateral Damage in America's Post-9/11 Wars$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Neta Crawford

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199981724

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199981724.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 22 May 2019

Norms in Tension

Norms in Tension

Military Necessity, Proportionality, and Double Effect

Chapter:
(p.159) 3 Norms in Tension
Source:
Accountability for Killing
Author(s):

Neta C. Crawford

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199981724.003.0004

Military Necessity, Proportionality, and Double Effect: This chapter explores the system of normative beliefs and international law — including the Geneva Conventions and the Additional Protocols — that is concerned with civilian immunity, military necessity and force protection. The chapter describes the moral reasoning that creates and excuses the category of collateral damage and asks whether foreseeable deaths ought to be excused. In the cases of Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan, the U.S. has taken important measures to reduce the effect of war on civilians. The current U.S. wars illustrate the uneven balance, or what may be better described as a deep tension between protecting noncombatant civilians, force protection, and military necessity. The notion of “necessary” military operations can be understood too broadly and that because deaths may often be foreseeable, we should not allow the doctrine of double effect to excuse unintended civilian deaths. Thus, while “collateral damage” might well be legal, there is still a moral problem that points to a legal lacuna.

Keywords:   international norms, international law, military necessity, proportionality, double effect, Geneva Conventions, Additional Protocols to the Geneval Conventions

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .