Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Classical World LiteraturesSino-Japanese and Greco-Roman Comparisons$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Wiebke Denecke

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199971848

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: April 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199971848.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 24 February 2020

Setting the Stage

Setting the Stage

Sino-Japanese and Greco-Roman Constellations

Chapter:
(p.20) Chapter 1 Setting the Stage
Source:
Classical World Literatures
Author(s):

Wiebke Denecke

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199971848.003.0002

This chapter explores three fundamental similarities that justify the comparison of the Sino-Japanese and Greco-Roman cultural constellations and three divergences that complicate it. Japanese and Latin literary cultures were both latecomers vis-à-vis their reference cultures; they started against the backdrop of highly sophisticated stages of literary production—Chinese Six Dynasties and Early Tang literature for Japan and Hellenistic literature for Rome; and their education systems were based on the adoption and adaption of the literary canon of their reference culture. However, their geopolitical constellations were radically different. Because Rome, unlike Japan, conquered its reference culture early in its history, there was a disjunction between cultural (Greek) and political (Roman) capital. Also, linguistically, while Japanese developed a reading technique that allowed them to read Chinese texts without the need for translation, Latin literature began with the translation and adaptation of Greek texts. Thirdly, Japanese and Latin literary cultures had a different spectrum and hierarchy of literary genres: Forms of short lyrical poetry headed the genre hierarchy in Japan. In contrast, epic—which did not exist in early East Asia—and dramatic literature—which did not develop until the fourteenth century in Japan—were prominent genres in early Latin literature.

Keywords:   Sino-Japanese reception, Greco-Roman reception, Imperial Greece, genres, genre hierarchies, translation, logographic languages, Hellenistic literature, Six Dynasties literature, China

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .