The U.S. Supreme Court has rebuilt the U.S. law of arbitration through its interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). In effect, the Court took the place of Congress and rewrote the initial legislation, giving it a more elaborate substantive content. The Court's endeavors in arbitration were motivated by the practical purpose of affording U.S. citizens access to an effective form of adjudication that would not be overwhelmed by the demands of litigants. With judicial due process being inviolable and no funds for new courts, the Court saw arbitration as a solution to the litigation crisis. The latter threatened to undermine constitutional government itself. It was in these circumstances that the highest court in the land proclaimed that the court system was unable to service civil litigation. In effect, legal values could inform society only through the surrogacy of arbitration.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.