Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Toward a New Federal Law on Arbitration$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Thomas E. Carbonneau

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780199965519

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: December 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199965519.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 05 June 2020

Reaffirming the Consumer Cases

Reaffirming the Consumer Cases

Chapter:
(p.71) 4 Reaffirming the Consumer Cases
Source:
Toward a New Federal Law on Arbitration
Author(s):

Thomas E. Carbonneau

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199965519.003.0006

The Court's recent rulings indicate that its support for arbitration remains unfailing. These cases address adhesive arbitration, perhaps the most controversial part of the judicial doctrine on arbitration. In fact, adhesive arbitration challenges the contract freedom principle. It represents the unilateral imposition of a legal obligation to arbitrate upon the weaker transactional party by the economically stronger party. The unfairness of the adhesive circumstances can be remedied through the doctrine of unconscionability by voiding the agreement to arbitrate. In two landmark cases (AT&T Mobility and Italian Colors Restaurant), the Court upheld adhesive arbitration, concluding that the marketplace had made adhesion a proper vehicle for contract formation and that class action waivers were enforceable as a legitimate part of the bargain for arbitration. Moreover, arbitration did not compromise statutory rights. Finally, Sutter and BG Group reaffirmed the vitality of Bazzle and the arbitrator's authority to interpret the arbitral clause.

Keywords:   adhesive arbitration, judicial doctrine, contract freedom, unilateral imposition, unfairness, unconscionability, contract formation, class action waivers, bargain for arbitration, statutory rights

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .