Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Common PrecedentsThe Presentness of the Past in Victorian Law and Fiction$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ayelet Ben-Yishai

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199937646

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937646.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 30 March 2020

Stare Decisis, Law Reports, and the Materiality of Legal Form

Stare Decisis, Law Reports, and the Materiality of Legal Form

Chapter:
(p.31) Chapter 1 Stare Decisis, Law Reports, and the Materiality of Legal Form
Source:
Common Precedents
Author(s):

Ayelet Ben-Yishai

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937646.003.0002

This chapter joins recent nineteenth-century legal history scholarship in reconsidering the history, function, and theory of the common law through a long-overdue inquiry into the nature of legal precedent and its narrative forms, the law reports. It shows that these awkward, often unreadable, case law narratives are in fact a product of a long discursive tradition, that their insular and skeletal forms enable the process of precedential reasoning and arguing. Read in their historical, legal, and narrative contexts, the anti-narrative form of the reports reveals how they negotiate the larger socio-political challenges to the legal culture in which they function. Negotiating between the new orthodoxy of positive law and the still powerful common law, precedent reveals the intricacies of nineteenth-century legal pluralism. By negotiating the tension between a concrete case and the abstract rule which is its potential precedent, anti-narrativity enables the communal (if contradictory) nature and goal of precedential reasoning: the creation of a stable common law, dating from “time immemorial.” Anti-narrativity thus constitutes and reveals the (troubled) narrative form of the (troubled) legal doctrine of stare decisis in the Victorian period; it also reconsiders the role of narrative in law.

Keywords:   time immemorial, nineteenth-century legal history, law reports, narrative form, narrative in law, common law, positive law, stare decisis, case law, legal pluralism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .