Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Flawed Convictions"Shaken Baby Syndrome" and the Inertia of Injustice$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Deborah Tuerkheimer

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780199913633

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: April 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199913633.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 29 January 2020

Guilty Pleas

Guilty Pleas

Chapter:
(p.159) 8 Guilty Pleas
Source:
Flawed Convictions
Author(s):

Deborah Tuerkheimer

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199913633.003.0008

When defendants in SBS cases plead guilty or no-contest, there are increasingly large disparities between the agreed-upon sentence and the defendant’s likely sentence after trial. “Lopsided” pleas entail a decided asymmetry between the seriousness of the formal charge, on the one hand; and the ultimate case disposition, on the other. This chapter considers the development of steep sentencing discounts as a reflection of a system in the midst of recalibration—a system in flux. It then explains why lopsided SBS pleas raise special concerns for innocence.

Keywords:   guilty pleas, no-contest pleas, lopsided pleas, steep sentencing discounts, system in flux, innocence

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .