Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Punishment, Participatory Democracy, and the Jury$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Albert W. Dzur

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199874095

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199874095.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 13 November 2019

Juries, Juries Everywhere (But Not Inside the Courts)

Juries, Juries Everywhere (But Not Inside the Courts)

Chapter:
(p.105) Chapter 6 Juries, Juries Everywhere (But Not Inside the Courts)
Source:
Punishment, Participatory Democracy, and the Jury
Author(s):

Albert W. Dzur

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199874095.003.0006

This chapter turns from the normative to the practical case for more participatory democracy in criminal justice by examining the contemporary use of jury-like procedures in municipal policymaking and in restorative justice programs. Reformers such as Dienel and Fishkin have employed citizens’ juries and deliberative polls in complex urban planning and environmental management matters. Both procedures recruit representative groups of citizens, provide information, facilitate dialogue, and seek to obtain reflective opinions useful for policymaking. Restorative justice programs like Vermont Reparative Probation also incorporate lay citizen participation to spark thoughtful dialogue between offenders, victims, and supporters. Differing in scope and process from the traditional jury, these jury-like experiments consider a wider range of issues and involve all participants in a multifaceted conversation. These experiments, this chapter argues, underscore the jury’s contemporary relevance and potential, yet they also demonstrate the comparative advantages of the traditional jury. The jury trial has created a distinct, durable, and public role for citizens; though circumscribed, lay decision making on the jury makes a concrete impact on real lives and incrementally shapes criminal justice more broadly.

Keywords:   citizens’, jury, criminal justice, deliberative poll, Dienel, Fishkin, participatory democracy, policymaking, restorative justice, Vermont Reparative Probation

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .