Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Punishment, Participatory Democracy, and the Jury$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Albert W. Dzur

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199874095

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199874095.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 22 January 2020

Participatory Democracy and Rational Disorganization

Participatory Democracy and Rational Disorganization

Chapter:
(p.41) Chapter 3 Participatory Democracy and Rational Disorganization
Source:
Punishment, Participatory Democracy, and the Jury
Author(s):

Albert W. Dzur

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199874095.003.0003

As in the previous chapter, this chapter seeks to uproot entrenched intellectual obstacles to participatory democracy, this time within political theory. Lay citizens without the guidance of experts are commonly viewed as handicapped by lack of knowledge, experience, and by being too numerous; even democratic theorists like Rousseau are modest about citizens’ ability to govern themselves without strict institutional constraints. Mainstream political science, exemplified by Hibbing and Theiss-Morse, provides apparent empirical support for more rather than less expert and representative government by showing lay citizens as uninterested in greater participation or civic responsibility. Progressive intellectuals Wolin and Morone have also argued that once integrated into formal governmental institutions, popular participation becomes co-opted and counterproductive. To overcome these challenges, this chapter introduces the concept of rational disorganization, the idea that power-sharing collaboration between laypeople and officials on complex tasks, such as reaching a verdict, draws on public practical reason, allows for reflexivity about rules and procedures, and permits greater attention to individual cases. Rational disorganization explains how participatory democratic institutions like the jury empower and give responsibility to citizens without overburdening or bureaucratizing them.

Keywords:   civic responsibility, Hibbing, knowledge, lay participation, Morone, participatory democracy, political theory, Rousseau, Theiss-Morse, Wolin

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .