Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
No Establishment of ReligionAmerica’s Original Contribution to Religious Liberty$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

T. Jeremy Gunn and John Witte

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199860371

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860371.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 20 November 2019

The Separation of Church and State versus Religion in the Public Square

The Separation of Church and State versus Religion in the Public Square

The Contested History of the Establishment Clause

Chapter:
(p.15) 1 The Separation of Church and State versus Religion in the Public Square
Source:
No Establishment of Religion
Author(s):

T. Jeremy Gunn

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860371.003.0001

This chapter argues that modern understandings of the historical origins of the Establishment Clause largely reflect one of two basic understandings of the origins of the clause: one that promotes the separation of church and state, and a second that favors governmental promotion of religious activity in the “public square.” The historical evidence suggests that through most of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries the term “separation of church and state” was broadly accepted by Americans as a constitutional value and constitutional ideal. This evidence draws into question Professor Philip Hamburger’s assertion that the term largely originated with nativists, “Know-Nothings,” and other anti-Catholics. Even the “Blaine amendment” controversy of the 1870s did not divide Americans with regard to the separation of church and state. Separation of church and state does not mean that religion will be removed from the public square, it means only that the government should not be involved in promoting religion. The Everson v. Board of Education decision was not innovative, but simply adopted widely accepted assumptions of the time.

Keywords:   Establishment Clause, separation of church and state, public square, Philip Hamburger, Blaine amendment, anti-Catholics, nativists

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .