Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Comparative Decision Making$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Thomas R. Zentall and Philip H. Crowley

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199856800

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199856800.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 15 October 2019

Increasing the Accuracy of Criminal Justice Decision Making

Increasing the Accuracy of Criminal Justice Decision Making

Chapter:
(p.353) Chapter 12 Increasing the Accuracy of Criminal Justice Decision Making
Source:
Comparative Decision Making
Author(s):

Sarah A. Crowley

Peter J. Neufeld

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199856800.003.0035

This chapter addresses decision making by the U.S. criminal justice system. Documentation by the Innocence Project of more than 280 wrongful convictions exposes a serious systemic accuracy problem. Faulty evidence and procedural failures may be much more widespread than these uniquely conclusive DNA-based examples because of an overemphasis on achieving finality. The trade-off between making a decision sooner or more deliberately has relevance to many personal or institutional decisions. Here, there is the additional element that guilt or innocence is already a fact, and the process weighs evidence in an attempt to establish the truth of one or the other. Reaching a decision (finality) and reaching the right decision (accuracy) are both important to society, but the stigma of accusation and conviction, suffering of victims, and political and institutional pressure can bias the system toward finality. The authors propose systemic changes using methods employed in other institutions.

Keywords:   decision making, criminal justice, United States, systemic accuracy, finality, evidence, stigma, suffering, institutional pressure

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .