Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Minding NormsMechanisms and dynamics of social order in agent societies$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Rosaria Conte, Giulia Andrighetto, and Marco Campennl

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199812677

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812677.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 18 August 2019

The Derivation of EMIL-S from EMIL-A

The Derivation of EMIL-S from EMIL-A

From Cognitive Architecture to Software Architecture

Chapter:
(p.118) 8 The Derivation of EMIL-S from EMIL-A
Source:
Minding Norms
Author(s):

Ulf Lotzmann

Michael Möhring

Klaus G. Troitzsch

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812677.003.0008

This chapter describes the process of converting the cognitive architecture of EMIL-A into a software architecture that can execute simulation models of social processes of norm emergence in different kinds of scenarios. EMIL-A describes the model of the process going on in human actors’ minds when they receive normative requests or observe other actors’ behavior, and Chapter 7 showed some first experiments with EMIL-A agents, albeit with no software architecture especially adapted to the underlying theory. The structure of this chapter is as follows: Sections 8.1 through 8.3 start with a general overview of agent-based systems and their requirements of a multi-agent simulation system, in which agents with norm-oriented behavior and norm-formation capabilities can be defined and simulated. Section 8.4 recapitulates the cognitive architecture of EMIL-A, followed in Section 8.5 by a list of correspondences between the main terms of both models. In Sections 8.6 and 8.7, the remaining differences between the EMIL-A design and the EMIL-S implementation are discussed, and it is argued that these differences are mainly technical and that EMIL-S necessarily implemented more details than EMIL-A foresaw.

Keywords:   norm emergence, simulation, software architecture, multi-agent system

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .