Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Retributivism Has a PastHas It a Future?$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Michael Tonry

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199798278

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199798278.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 03 June 2020

A Political Theory of Imprisonment for Public Protection

A Political Theory of Imprisonment for Public Protection

Chapter:
(p.130) 7 A Political Theory of Imprisonment for Public Protection
Source:
Retributivism Has a Past
Author(s):

Peter Ramsay

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199798278.003.0007

This chapter describes a theoretical justification for imprisonment for public protection (IPP) that is different from and arguably more politically influential at present than traditional utilitarian justifications for selective incapacitation. The first part of the chapter argues that the IPP regime of preventive detention can be justified in the terms of two theories that derive from traditions that, in the minds of their protagonists at least, are alternatives to liberalism in general and to Hobbes in particular. The two theories that can do the justificatory work for IPP are the Third Way theory of Anthony Giddens and the republican penal theory of John Braithwaite and Philip Pettit. Having established that these theories can provide a normative justification for IPP, the second part of the chapter argues that these justifications are expressions of a wider ideology that is indeed a necessary counterpart of neoliberal economic and social policy. But this ideology nevertheless constructs the relation of security and freedom in a way that is both inconsistent with the foundations of liberal thought and denies to the state the political authority that characterized Hobbes's Leviathan.

Keywords:   theoretical justification, prevention detention, Hobbes, Third Way theory, republican penal theory

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .