Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Commonsense ConsequentialismWherein Morality Meets Rationality$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Douglas W. Portmore

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199794539

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794539.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 16 July 2019

Dual-Ranking Act-Consequentialism

Dual-Ranking Act-Consequentialism

Reasons, Morality, and Overridingness

Chapter:
(p.118) 5 Dual-Ranking Act-Consequentialism
Source:
Commonsense Consequentialism
Author(s):

Douglas W. Portmore

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794539.003.0005

The chapter argues that in order to accommodate many typical agent-centered options and to resolve the paradox of supererogation, we should accept that non-moral reasons can, and sometimes do, prevent moral reasons, even those with considerable moral requiring strength, from generating moral requirements. What's more, we should accept that an agent's performing a given act is morally permissible if and only if there is no available alternative that she has both more (moral) requiring reason and more reason, all things considered, to perform. And it is argued that, given this account of moral permissibility, the consequentialist has no choice but to adopt a dual-ranking version of consequentialism—one that ranks outcomes both in terms of how much moral reason the agent has to want them to obtain and in terms of how much reason, all things considered, the agent has to want them to obtain.

Keywords:   overridingness, paradox of supererogation, moral reasons, non-moral reasons, agent-centered options, transitivity, independence axiom, Alastair Norcross, Clay Splawn

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .