Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Impossibility of PerfectionAristotle, Feminism, and the Complexities of Ethics$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Michael Slote

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199790821

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199790821.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 19 July 2019

Alternative Views

Alternative Views

Chapter:
(p.54) Chapter 3 Alternative Views
Source:
The Impossibility of Perfection
Author(s):

Micheal Slote

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199790821.003.0004

There are at least four main views about the structure of the virtues. Aristotle holds that the virtues are a unity and that perfection is possible; Peter Geach claims that they don't form a unity, but that they are mutually compatible and allow for perfection; A. D. M. Walker says that the virtues neither form a unity nor are mutually compatible, but appears to hold, nonetheless, that perfect virtue is possible; and Isaiah Berlin and I think that the virtues aren't a unity and that they conflict in ways that make perfect virtue impossible. Berlin's views and my own stand diametrically opposed to Aristotle's in this ethical spectrum. But it is also important to see that the examples that were used to support our view aren't open to certain obvious objections. One can’t, for example, ensure the possibility of perfection by assigning conflicting goods or virtues to different periods of life or by making it (too) easy to possess them.

Keywords:   Aristotle, Isaiah Berlin, conflicts of virtues, counterexamples, Peter Geach, Gary Watson, partial values, perfection, unity thesis, A. D. M. Walker

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .