Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Cosmopolitan Political ThoughtMethod, Practice, Discipline$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Farah Godrej

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199782062

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199782062.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 July 2019

Canons, Traditions and Cosmopolitanism

Canons, Traditions and Cosmopolitanism

Choosing the “Units” of Analysis

Chapter:
(p.26) 2 Canons, Traditions and Cosmopolitanism
Source:
Cosmopolitan Political Thought
Author(s):

Farah Godrej

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199782062.003.0002

Can we turn to new and different intellectual resources without reproducing the categories and modes of inquiry pertaining to a Westcentric understanding of political theory? In order to avoid reinscribing a specific understanding of what even counts as political theory, this chapter argues that a cosmopolitan political thought requires a method of investigation allowing each tradition and its members to identify and assign value to its own intellectual resources, according to standards internal to that tradition. The chapter posits an approach which involves three critical interventions in the canonical understandings of a tradition’s resources: genealogical investigation, internal investigations of power and dissent, and finally, immersion within the scholarly, vocational practices of knowledge-production and reproduction within a society. Such an approach should seek out those insights that either displace the centrality of Western preoccupations with particular kinds of questions, or explore seemingly familiar questions in ways that reveal the narrow specificity of the West’s own modes of political inquiry. Examples include explorations of the Confucian concept of ren, Koranic exegesis in Islam, and Gandhi’s asceticism.

Keywords:   reinscribe, immersion, canons, canonical, Confucian, ren, Koran, Islam, Gandhi, asceticism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .