Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Accountability and DemocracyThe Pitfalls and Promise of Popular Control$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Craig T. Borowiak

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199778256

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199778256.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 July 2019

Answering for Exclusion

Answering for Exclusion

Deliberative Democracy and the Demands of Justice

Chapter:
(p.100) 4 Answering for Exclusion
Source:
Accountability and Democracy
Author(s):

Craig T. Borowiak

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199778256.003.0004

This chapter turns to deliberative democracy frameworks to further expand the meaning of accountability beyond instrumental and disciplinary approaches and to raise questions about institutional exclusions at local, national, and transnational levels. For deliberative democrats, accountability is not only about exerting control, it is also about justifying behavior: Accountability means answerability. Having to answer in deliberative publics for the consequences and rationales of one’s actions has transformative potential. It enhances the probability of realizing justice and of finding common ground. Deliberative accountability also places pressure upon the boundaries of political communities, including national ones, and demands that those whose actions affect others be compelled to justify their actions to all those affected. This all-affected principle provides considerable normative leverage against exclusive political communities, but it also poses creates impossible inclusion demands. The chapter argues that the ensuing tension should offer an opening for critical theory, a prod for innovation, and a lesson about the need for institutional humility.

Keywords:   deliberative democracy, answerability, all-affected principle, transformation, justice, boundaries, inclusion

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .