Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Accountability and DemocracyThe Pitfalls and Promise of Popular Control$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Craig T. Borowiak

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199778256

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199778256.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 July 2019

Disciplining Democracy

Disciplining Democracy

The Principal–Agent Model of Accountability

Chapter:
(p.53) 2 Disciplining Democracy
Source:
Accountability and Democracy
Author(s):

Craig T. Borowiak

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199778256.003.0002

This chapter argues that contemporary social scientific discourse has become dominated by a narrow, disciplinary model of accountability typified by the widespread use of the principal–agent framework. Within this model, accountability is treated as involving citizen “principals” holding representative “agents” to account in order to compel the agent to uphold the principal’s interests. Accountability becomes equated with punishability. The model has the benefit of illuminating how conflicting interests and informational constraints can confound the effects of electoral accountability. Nonetheless, when it comes to gaining a full picture of what democratic accountability entails, this approach has several shortcomings. It is too bound to institutional hierarchies at the expense of horizontal forms of accountability. It is too focused on disciplining officials according to the principal’s preferences, at the expense of accountability’s role in generating preferences and new forms of solidarity. It also reflects a conservative bias that favors formal institutions and that discounts accountability initiatives coming from outside established institutional structures.

Keywords:   agency theory, principal, agent, electoral accountability, hierarchy, discipline, punishability

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .