Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Heuristics Debate$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mark Kelman

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199755608

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755608.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 25 May 2020

Criminal Punishment and Cognition

Criminal Punishment and Cognition

(p.119) 6 Criminal Punishment and Cognition
The Heuristics Debate

Mark Kelman (Contributor Webpage)

Oxford University Press

Because fast and frugal heuristics theorists believe that people make all decisions, including decisions about whether to comply with legal regulations, by looking to a small number of lexically-processed decision-relevant cues, they argue that we will not manipulate crime rates as well by tinkering with expected punishments as we will by, for instance, engraining habits or conforming law to pre-existing social norms or altering the capacity of putative violators to engage in unwanted conduct. Heuristics and biases theorists believe that would-be criminals may care about the expected value of crimes they are considering committing, but that they often misestimate the probability of being sanctioned and evaluate sanctions in ways that are highly contextually sensitive. The chances of punishment may often be underestimated, and both the experienced and remembered pain of the punishment that criminals actually suffer may be counter-intuitively low. Incapacitationists should note that F&F scholars are wary of using multi-cue regression measures in predicting future dangerousness, and that H&B work should lead us to worry that we will systematically overestimate the dangerousness of criminals.

Keywords:   fast and frugal heuristics, criminal sanctions, criminal sanctions, deterrence, incapacitation, retribution, expected punishment, duration neglect, dangerousness predictions, hedonic adaptation, punishment, legal compliance

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .