Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
RetributivismEssays on Theory and Policy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mark D. White

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199752232

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199752232.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 17 July 2019

The Choice of Evils and the Collisions of Theory

The Choice of Evils and the Collisions of Theory

Chapter:
(p.192) 10 The Choice of Evils and the Collisions of Theory
Source:
Retributivism
Author(s):

Marc O. DeGirolami

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199752232.003.0011

This chapter explores the relationship of retributivism to “choice of evils” defense: If an actor must either break the law or allow something terrible to happen, the actor who breaks the law may be justified if the evil he chose outweighs the evil that he prevented. Legal scholars generally consider this to be a clear example of a purely consequentialist calculation. In nearly every jurisdiction, however, an actor who acted with purpose or knowledge in causing the necessity is barred from the defense; this bar has also been rejected as illegitimate by many scholars. The chapter suggests that the connection between retributivism and the choice of evils defense has been overlooked because scholars have focused on this defense as purely consequentialist while marginalizing its retributivist features. More broadly, the chapter argues for a pluralistic understanding of criminal doctrines such as the necessity defense, rather than seeking conceptual purity of theoretical explanation.

Keywords:   retributivism, punishment, justice, choice of evils, necessity defense, consequentialism, pluralism, affirmative, defense

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .