Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Charles HodgeGuardian of American Orthodoxy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Paul C. Gutjahr

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199740420

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740420.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 18 November 2019

The Imputation Controversy

The Imputation Controversy

Chapter:
(p.135) 22 The Imputation Controversy
Source:
Charles Hodge
Author(s):

Paul C. Gutjahr (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740420.003.0022

Chapter twenty-two addresses the key doctrine of imputation in terms of the Princeton faculty and their disputes over the doctrine with both Nathaniel Taylor (and his New Haven Theology) at Yale and Moses Stuart at Andover. Princeton’s view stood against the rising popularity of the New Haven Theology and its influence on the revivalist theology found in the Second Great Awakening.

Keywords:   Charles Hodge, Moses Stuart, Nathaniel Taylor, Archibald Alexander, Biblical Repertory, Quarterly Christian Spectator, Yale, New Haven Theology, revivalism, Second Great Awakening, imputation, Andover

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .