Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Philosophy of Science MattersThe Philosophy of Peter Achinstein$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Gregory J. Morgan

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199738625

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199738625.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 16 October 2019

Achinstein and the Evidence for Evolution

Achinstein and the Evidence for Evolution

Chapter:
(p.191) 15 Achinstein and the Evidence for Evolution
Source:
Philosophy of Science Matters
Author(s):

Richard A. Richards (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199738625.003.0015

Peter Achinstein began his Book of Evidence with the claim that standard philosophical theories of evidence are and ought to be ignored by scientists. He could have gone further: historians of science should ignore standard philosophical theories of evidence as well. The problem is that these theories are prescriptive, formal, and a priori. Consequently, they are unable to help us understand what counted as evidence for actual scientists and they are insensitive to context, in particular to scientists’ beliefs about empirical facts. What historians of science need is, first, a descriptive concept of evidence that can help us understand when something was actually evidence for some person at some time; second, a prescriptive concept that is sensitive to context and empirical knowledge. Achinstein's framework gives us both: first, in his subjective concept of evidence, which is relativized to persons, and second, in his epistemic concept, which is relativized to context. These concepts can help us better understand complex historical cases such as Darwin's acceptance of branching evolution on the basis of the taxonomic facts, and his apparently conflicting views about whether these facts were evidentially sufficient.

Keywords:   prescriptive concepts of evidence, descriptive concepts of evidence, induction, subjective evidence, epistemic situation evidence, Darwin, evolution, taxonomic facts

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .