Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Federalism and the Tug of War Within$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Erin Ryan

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199737987

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737987.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 June 2019

The Rehnquist Revival of Jurisdictional Separation

The Rehnquist Revival of Jurisdictional Separation

Chapter:
(p.109) 4 The Rehnquist Revival of Jurisdictional Separation
Source:
Federalism and the Tug of War Within
Author(s):

Erin Ryan

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737987.003.0004

Chapter Four outlines the Rehnquist Court’s New Federalism embrace of dual federalism idealism, focusing on its Tenth Amendment and preemption cases. Beginning with reflections on the Court’s problematic quest for jurisprudential absolutes, the chapter compares the contemporary Tenth Amendment anti-commandeering cases to their predecessors. It then reviews dualist elements in other doctrinal areas of the New Federalism, including expanded state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment and limited federal power under the Commerce Clause and Section Five of the Fourteenth Amendment. Finally, the chapter explores how the Rehnquist Court’s federalism and preemption cases join to reify greater separation between idealized spheres of state and federal prerogative. It critiques the resulting model for failure to grapple with the values tug of war in contexts of jurisdictional overlap. Through the combined force of formal federalism doctrine and functional preemption decisions, the Rehnquist Court’s approach shifted the baseline from the uncritical overlap of cooperative federalism to a model emphasizing protected zones of exclusive state and federal power. The overarching implication is that the checks and balances of jurisdictional separation warrant protection at the expense of other values. The New Federalism decisions do not reestablish nineteenth century dualism, but they create theoretical tension with the cooperative federalism model that continues to predominate in federalism practice. They idealize the Tenth Amendment as the arbiter of an idealized, bright-line boundary between proper state and national jurisdiction, even at the interjurisdictional margin that belies such clarity.

Keywords:   rehnquist Court, jurisdictional separation, new Federalism, dual federalism, tenth Amendment, preemption, commandeering, anti-commandeering, state sovereign immunity, eleventh Amendment, enumerated federal powers, commerce Clause, fourteenth Amendment Section Five, bright-line rules

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .