Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Miranda RulingIts Past, Present, and Future$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Lawrence S. Wrightsman and Mary L. Pitman

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199730902

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730902.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 18 January 2020

The Decision in Miranda v. Arizona

The Decision in Miranda v. Arizona

Chapter:
(p.41) 3 The Decision in Miranda v. Arizona
Source:
The Miranda Ruling
Author(s):

Lawrence S. Wrightsman

Mary L. Pitman

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730902.003.003

This chapter describes the crime and the subsequent police interrogation and trial, all of which led to the 1966 Supreme Court decision ruling that criminal defendants had the right to counsel or to remain silent when facing a possible interrogation. The disagreements between justices which led to a number of dissenting opinions are analyzed.

Keywords:   Ernesto Miranda, in-custody, interrogation, Miranda v. Arizona, Warren Court

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .