Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Manifest MadnessMental Incapacity in the Criminal Law$

Arlie Loughnan

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199698592

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199698592.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 03 June 2020

(p.xv) Table of Cases

(p.xv) Table of Cases

Source:
Manifest Madness
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

All cases are from England and Wales unless otherwise specified.

  • A v DPP [1997] 1 Cr App R 27 ……… 90–1

  • Attorney-General for Jersey v Holley [2005] 2 AC 580 ……… 23, 28, 194, 246, 253, 257–8

  • Attorney-General for Northern Ireland v Gallagher [1963] AC 349 ……… 118, 185

  • Attorney-General's Reference (No 2 of 1992) [1994] QB 91 ……… 126

  • Attorney-General's Reference (No 3 of 1998) [2000] QB 401 ……… 95–6

  • Beverley's Case (1603) 4 Co Rep 123; (1550) 1 Plowd 1 ……… 174

  • Bratty v Attorney-General for Northern Ireland [1963] AC 386 ……… 5, 26–7, 118–19, 127–31, 156–8, 160–3, 185, 196, 217, 247

  • Broome v Perkins (1987) 85 Cr App R 321 ……… 126, 132, 161

  • C (A Minor) Appellant v DPP [1996] AC 1 ……… 30, 68, 78, 88–90, 92–3

  • C v DPP [1994] 3 WLR 888 ……… 92–3

  • Carraher v HM Advocate 1946 JC 108 (Scotland) ……… 231

  • CC (A Minor) v DPP [1996] 1 Cr App R 375 ……… 78

  • Crown Court at Maidstone ex parte London Borough of Harrow [2000] 1 Cr App R 117 ……… 158

  • DPP v Beard [1920] 1 AC 479 ……… 43, 118, 122, 174–5, 182–3, 185–6, 190, 194

  • DPP v Camplin [1978] AC 705 ……… 30, 256

  • DPP v H [1997] 1 WLR 1406 ……… 121, 134

  • DPP v Majewski [1977] AC 443 ……… 31, 131, 183, 185–91, 193–4, 196, 199–200

  • DPP v Morgan [1976] AC 182 ……… 187

  • DPP v Newbury [1977] AC 500 ……… 190

  • DPP v P [2008] 1 WLR 1005 ……… 90, 93

  • Galbraith v HM Advocate (No 2) 2002 JC 1 (Scotland) ……… 231

  • Governor of Stafford Prison, ex parte Emery [1909] 2 KB 81 ……… 81

  • Habib Ghulam [2010] 1 WLR 891 ……… 87

  • Hill v Baxter [1958] 1 QB 277 ……… 27, 119, 128, 131, 157, 163–4

  • HM v McLean (1876) 3 Couper 334 ……… 229–30

  • HM Advocate v Dingwall (1867) 5 Irv 466 ……… 229–30

  • HM Advocate v Savage 1923 SLT 659 (Scotland) ……… 231–2

  • JM (A Minor) v Runeckles (1984) 79 Cr App R 255 ……… 90–1

  • Kennedy v HM Advocate (1944) JC 171 (Scotland) ……… 196

  • L (A Minor) v DPP [1996] 2 Cr App R 501 ……… 91

  • M'Naghten’s case (1843) 10 Cl & Fin 200 ……… 8, 22, 42–3, 54, 74, 113–17, 120–4, 129, 145, 147, 161, 164–5, 169, 185, 188, 226, 238, 241

  • Moyle v R [2008] EWCA Crim 3059 ……… 102

  • Queen v Berry (1876) 1 QBD 447 ……… 83, 99

  • (p.xvi) Queen v O'Connor [1980] 146 CLR 64 (Australia) ……… 196

  • Queen v Shickle [2005] EWCA Crim 1881 ……… 245

  • R v Ahluwalia (1993) 96 [2003] 1 AC 1209 ……… 236

  • R v Allen [1988] Crim LR 698 ……… 192

  • R v Antoine [2001] 1 AC 340 ……… 95–6, 99

  • R v Arnold’s case (1724) 16 St Tr 695 ……… 106, 113, 141

  • R v B, W, S, H and W [2009] 1 Cr App R 261 ……… 97

  • R v Bailey [1983] 1 WLR 760 ……… 132, 190, 193–4

  • R v Benyon [1957] 2 QB 111 ……… 83

  • R v Bingham [1991] Crim LR 433 ……… 128–9

  • R v Bree [2008] QB 131 ……… 192

  • R v Budd [1962] Crim LR 49 ……… 128, 161

  • R v Burgess [1991] 2 QB 92 ……… 118–19, 130, 161

  • R v Burles [1970] 2 WLR 597 ……… 99

  • R v Burns (1973) 58 Cr App R 364 ……… 163, 190

  • R v Byrne [1960] 2 QB 396 ……… 28, 117, 123, 146, 236–8, 240–1, 248

  • R v Caldwell [1982] AC 341 ……… 188, 190

  • R v Campbell (1987) 84 Cr App R 255 ……… 245–6

  • R v Campbell [1997] Crim LR 495 ……… 234

  • R v Carr-Briant [1943] KB 607 ……… 163

  • R v Chard (1971) 56 Cr App R 268 ……… 157

  • R v Charlson [1955] 1 WLR 317 ……… 127, 163, 167

  • R v Clarke (1972) 56 Cr App R 225 ……… 117

  • R v Codère (1916) 12 Cr App R 21 ……… 120–1

  • R v Coulburn (1988) 87 Cr App R 309 ……… 78, 90

  • R v Cox [1968] 1 WLR 308 ……… 158, 247–8

  • R v Davies (1853) 3 C & K 328 ……… 82

  • R v Davies [1913] 1 KB 573 ……… 122

  • R v Davis (1881) 14 Cox CC 563 ……… 185, 194

  • R v Diamond [2008] EWCA Crim 923 ……… 245

  • R v Dietschmann [2003] 1 AC 1209 ……… 236, 239, 243

  • R v Dix (1982) 74 Cr App R 306 ……… 249

  • R v Dunbar [1958] 1 QB 1 ……… 246

  • R v Durante [1972] 3 All ER 962 ……… 190

  • R v Eatch [1980] Crim LR 650 ……… 190, 192

  • R v Egan [1992] 4 All ER 470 ……… 95–6, 243

  • R v Erskine; Williams [2010] 1 WLR 183 ……… 244–5

  • R v Felstead [1914] AC 534 ……… 111

  • R v Ferrers (1760) 19 St Tr 885 ……… 74, 141

  • R v Friend [1997] 1 WLR 1433 ……… 99

  • R v Gore (Lisa Therese) (Deceased) [2007] EWCA Crim 2789 ……… 28, 218

  • R v Gorrie (1918) 83 JP 136 ……… 90

  • R v Graddock [1981] Current L Ybk 476 ……… 236

  • R v Graham [1982] 1 All ER 801 ……… 22

  • R v Grant [1960] Crim LR 424 ……… 162, 246

  • R v Grant [2002] QB 1030 ……… 85, 96–7, 99

  • R v Grindley (1819) 1 C & M 8 ……… 182–3

  • R v H [2003] UKHL 1 ……… 61, 83, 86, 97

  • R v Hadfield (1800) 27 St Tr 1281 ……… 75, 109, 113

  • R v Hale, The Times, 22 July 1936 ……… 217

  • R v Hardie (1985) 80 Cr App R 157 ……… 131, 188, 193–4, 199

  • R v Harrison-Owen [1951] 2 All ER 726 ……… 103, 126, 158, 163

  • (p.xvii) R v Hasan [2005] 2 Cr App R 22 ……… 22

  • R v Heard [2007] 3 WLR 475 ……… 183, 188, 190

  • R v Hennessy [1989] 1 WLR 287 ……… 5, 118, 126, 129–30

  • R v Hobson [1998] 1 Cr App R 31 ……… 236

  • R v Holman (Unreported) CA, 27 April 1994 ……… 99

  • R v Holmes [1953] 2 All ER 324 ……… 157

  • R v Horseferry Road Magistrates, ex parte K [1997] QB 23 ……… 133–4

  • R v Inseal (CA, 10 May 1991) ……… 195

  • R v Ireland (1910) 9 Cr App R 139 ……… 111

  • R v Isitt (1978) 67 Cr App R 44 ……… 126, 132

  • R v James; R v Karimi [2006] 1 Cr App R 440 ……… 23, 258

  • R v Jennion [1962] 1 WLR 317 ……… 248

  • R v JTB [2009] 2 Cr App R 500 ……… 74, 93

  • R v Kai-Whitewind (Chaha'oh Niyol) [2005] 2 Cr App R 457 ……… 211, 221–2

  • R v Kemp [1957] 1 QB 399 ……… 117–18, 128, 162

  • R v Kershaw (1902) 18 TLR 357 ……… 78, 90

  • R v Khan (Dawood) [2010] 1 Cr App R 74 ……… 248

  • R v Kingston [1995] 2 AC 355 ……… 192–3

  • R v Kooken (1982) 74 Cr App R 30 ……… 246

  • R v Kopsch (1925) 19 Cr App Rep 50 ……… 123

  • R v Lambert [2002] QB 1112 ……… 164

  • R v Latus [2006] EWCA Crim 3187 ……… 245

  • R v Lawrence [1981] 2 WLR 524 ……… 173, 197

  • R v Lewis (1989) 11 Cr App R (S) 577 ……… 224–5

  • R v Lincoln (Kesteven) Justices, ex parte O'Connor [1983] 1 WLR 335 ……… 87

  • R v Lipman [1970] 1 QB 152 ……… 131, 193

  • R v Lloyd [1967] 1 QB 175 ……… 241

  • R v M [2003] EWCA Crim 3452 ……… 99, 101

  • R v M (Edward) & Ors [2002] 1 Cr App R 25 ……… 97

  • R v Martin [2003] 2 Cr App R 322 ……… 96, 99

  • R v Matheson [1958] 1 WLR 474 ……… 248

  • R v Meade [1909] 1 KB 895 ……… 185

  • R v Monkhouse (1849) 4 Cox CC 55 ……… 182

  • R v Neaven [2007] 2 All ER 891 ……… 245

  • R v O'Connell [1996] EWCA Crim 1552 ……… 238

  • R v O'Connor (1994) 15 Cr App R 473 ……… 196

  • R v O'Donoghue (1927) 20 Cr App R 132 ……… 217

  • R v O'Driscoll (1977) 65 Cr App R 50 ……… 190

  • R v Pearson’s case (1835) 2 Lew 144 ……… 192

  • R v Pinfold and Mackenney [2004] 2 Cr App R 5 ……… 157

  • R v Podola [1960] 1 QB 325 ……… 61, 81–3, 99, 162

  • R v Price [1963] 2 QB 1 ……… 162

  • R v Quick [1973] 57 Cr App R 722 ……… 120, 128–30, 133

  • R v Ramchurn [2010] 2 Cr App R 3 ……… 243

  • R v Reniger v Feogossa (1551) 75 ER 1 ……… 174

  • R v Reynolds (Gary) [2004] EWCA Crim 1834 ……… 236

  • R v Richardson and Irwin (1999) 1 Cr App Rep 392 ……… 189

  • R v Rivett (1950) 34 Cr App R 87 ……… 82

  • R v Roach [2001] EWCA Crim 2698 ……… 129

  • R v Roberts [1954] 2 QB 329 ……… 83, 99

  • R v Robertson [1968] 1 WLR 1767 ……… 99, 101

  • R v Sainsbury (1989) 11 Cr App R (S) 533 ……… 224

  • R v Sanderson (1994) 98 Cr App R 325 ……… 238–9

  • (p.xviii) R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody (1994) 1 AC 57 ……… 89

  • R v Seers (1984) 79 Cr App R 261 ……… 236–7

  • R v Sharp [1960] 1 QB 357 ……… 82, 99

  • R v Sheehan; R v Moore [1975] 1 WLR 739 ……… 45, 187, 192

  • R v Smith [1979] 1 WLR 1445 ……… 157

  • R v Smith (Morgan) [2001] 1 Cr App R 31 ……… 23, 28, 252, 257–8

  • R v Soderman (1935) AC 462 ……… 163

  • R v Spriggs [1958] 1 QB 270 ……… 236

  • R v Stapleton (1952) 86 CLR 358 ……… 121

  • R v Stewart [2009] 2 Cr App R 500 ……… 195, 240

  • R v Stripp (1979) 69 Cr App R 318 ……… 127, 157, 161

  • R v Sullivan [1984] 1 AC 156 ……… 26, 111, 118–19, 127, 130

  • R v Sutcliffe, The Times, 30 April 1981 ……… 247

  • R v T [1990] Crim LR 256 ……… 128, 133

  • R v Tandy [1989] 1 WLR 350 ……… 194–5, 239, 248

  • R v Tolson (1889) 23 QBD 168 ……… 130

  • R v Turner [1975] QB 834 ……… 157

  • R v Walden [1959] 1 WLR 1008 ……… 242

  • R v Weekes [1999] 2 Cr App R 520 ……… 236

  • R v Windle [1952] 2 QB 826 ……… 121

  • R v Wood [2010] 1 Cr App R (S) 6 ……… 241

  • R v Wood (Clive) [2009] 1 WLR 496 ……… 195, 240

  • R v Woods (1982) 74 Cr App Rep 312 ……… 189

  • Rabey v R (1980) 15 CR (3d) 225 (Canada) ……… 128

  • Reg v Cruse (1838) 8 C & P 541 ……… 182

  • Reg v Smith (Sidney) (1845) 1 Cox CC 260 ……… 78

  • Reg v Turton (1854) 6 Cox 395 ……… 82

  • Reniger v Feogossa (1551) 75 ER 1 ……… 174

  • Rex v Carroll (1835) 7 C & P 145 ……… 182

  • Rex v Dashwood [1943] KB 1 ……… 61, 86

  • Rex v Dyson (1831) 7 C & P 305 ……… 77, 81, 99

  • Rex v Meakin (1836) 173 ER 132 ……… 182

  • Rex v North (1937) 1 Criminal Law Journal 84 ……… 156

  • Rex v Pritchard (1836) 7 C & P 303 ……… 75, 77, 81, 99–100

  • Rex v Smith (1910) 6 Cr App R 19 ……… 162

  • Rose v R [1961] AC 496 ……… 237

  • Ruse v Read [1949] 1 KB 377 ……… 190

  • SC v United Kingdom (2004) 40 EHRR 10 (ECHR) ……… 93

  • T v United Kingdom (2000) 30 EHRR 121;

  • V v United Kingdom (2000) EHRR 121 (Application No 24724/94) (ECHR) ……… 89, 93

  • Watmore v Jenkins [1962] 2 QB 572 ……… 126, 161

  • Wheeler and Batsford v Alderson (1831) 3 Hog Ecc 574 ……… 184

  • Winterwerp v The Netherlands (1979) 2 EHRR 387 (ECHR) ……… 85

  • Woolmington v DPP [1935] All ER 1 ……… 78, 122–3, 161, 163–5, 189