Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
God in the Age of Science?A Critique of Religious Reason$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Herman Philipse

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199697533

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697533.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 03 June 2020

The Predictive Power of Theism

The Predictive Power of Theism

(p.140) 9 The Predictive Power of Theism
God in the Age of Science?

Herman Philipse

Oxford University Press

Theism can be a theory or existential hypothesis to be confirmed by empirical evidence only if it has some predictive power. Theists should (and do) prefer a purely logical definition of predictive power, according to which a hypothesis h has predictive power with regard to evidence e iff the relevance condition P ( e | h & k ) 〉 P ( e | k ) is met. But theism can have predictive power in this sense with regard to existing evidence only if one can non-arbitrarily attribute creative intentions to God. The auxiliary hypotheses attributing these intentions should be independently justified. It is argued that Richard Swinburne’s solution to this problem of theism’s predictive power on the basis of his moral objectivism (or moral realism) fails, and that his attributions of creative intentions to God are anthropomorphic projections.

Keywords:   Dilemma of God-of-the-gaps, Pseudo-theory, Immunization, Design arguments, Newton, Pierre Simon Laplace, William Paley, Henry Drummond, Primary causes, Secondary causes, Too odd or too big for science to explain, Miracles, Christ’s bodily resurrection, David Hume, Testimony, Gospels, Paul, Mark, Empty tomb, Incarnation, Atonement, Koran, Cognitive dissonance, Leon Festinger, Collaborative storytelling, Source amnesia, Principle of collective causality, Big Bang theory, Fine-tuning arguments

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .