Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Destiny and DeliberationEssays in Philosophical Theology$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jonathan L. Kvanvig

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199696574

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696574.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 21 October 2019

Creation, Deliberation, and Molinism

Creation, Deliberation, and Molinism

Chapter:
(p.105) 7 Creation, Deliberation, and Molinism
Source:
Destiny and Deliberation
Author(s):

Jonathan L Kvanvig

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696574.003.0007

In philosophical theology, Molinism is ‘the beautiful game’. It allows one to hold a libertarian account of human freedom while at the same time preserving a strong view of divine providence. This aspect of Molinism provides the fundamental motivation for Molinist doctrine. In usual presentations, the core explanatory mechanism designed to satisfy this motivation is the idea of counterfactuals of freedom that are outside God's control, but it has been argued that this approach is mistaken. Abandoning this standard form of Molinism raises the issue of what explanatory mechanism, if any, can satisfy the fundamental Molinist motivation. The answer to this question will require an explication of the deliberational model of creation and an investigation of conditionals of deliberation that are suitable for use in such a deliberational model. The difficulties faced by the standard Molinist approach provide the needed justification for this more fundamental investigation in search of an adequate Molinist explanatory mechanism. This chapter argues that no extant version of Molinism, neither standard nor Maverick, can offer an adequate account of creation and providence. Thus, that a different approach is needed if the hope Molinism provides is to be sustained.

Keywords:   philosophical theology, Molinist doctrine, deliberatonal model, creation, delibration

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .