Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The A Priori in Philosophy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Albert Casullo and Joshua C. Thurow

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199695331

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695331.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 22 October 2019

Skepticism, Reason, and Reidianism

Skepticism, Reason, and Reidianism

Chapter:
(p.205) 9 Skepticism, Reason, and Reidianism
Source:
The A Priori in Philosophy
Author(s):

Joel Pust

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695331.003.0010

The traditional problems of epistemology have often been thought to be properly solved only by the provision of an argument, with premises justified by rational intuition and introspection, for the probable truth of our beliefs in the problematic domains. Following the lead of Thomas Reid, a sizable number of contemporary epistemologists, including many proponents of so-called “Reformed epistemology” regarding religious belief, reject as arbitrary the preferential treatment of reason and introspection implicit in the traditional view of the problems. These “Reidians” insist that the traditional problems cannot be solved in the expected manner, but they go on to suggest that this result is of little significance because similar skeptical questions can be raised regarding a priori and introspective justification. After making clear the significance of the Reidian objection, this chapter endeavors to defend the traditional preference for rational intuition over our other sources of belief by demonstrating that the usual skeptical worries cannot be equally raised against a priori justification. Then, after a brief consideration of some unduly neglected passages in Reid’s writings in which he appears to concede that the traditional partiality to reason and introspection is not, in fact, arbitrary, this chapter argues that it is the Reidians who are guilty of arbitrary partiality.

Keywords:   a priori, skepticism, Thomas Reid, reformed epistemology

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .