Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic ChangeA Cross-Linguistic Perspective$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Heiko Narrog

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199694372

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 22 July 2019

Shifts Between Types of Modality in Traditional Terms

Shifts Between Types of Modality in Traditional Terms

Chapter:
(p.185) 6 Shifts Between Types of Modality in Traditional Terms
Source:
Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change
Author(s):

Heiko Narrog

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.003.0006

In this chapter, the directionality of change with respect to three traditional notions of modality is examined. First, change between possibility and necessity is analyzed. While change from possibility to necessity is more common than vice‐versa, no fixed directionality can be found, as demonstrated with examples from Germanic languages. Second, contrary to previous assumptions, change between participant‐internal and participant‐external modality is also bi‐directional. The third section of this chapter offers an analysis of the question why change from deontic to epistemic modality is by far not as common as once thought. Contrasting the development of modality in Japanese, a language currently without significant modal polyfunctionality comparable to that in English and German, this chapter suggests that the lack of shifts from deontic to epistemic modality in this language is due to conditions of the modal system in Japanese, and to socio‐cultural rather than semantic or pragmatic factors.

Keywords:   possibility, necessity, participant‐internal modality, participant‐external modality, deontic modality, epistemic modality

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .