Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Sovereignty of LawFreedom, Constitution and Common Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

T.R.S. Allan

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199685066

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685066.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 14 July 2020

Judicial Review and Judicial Restraint

Judicial Review and Judicial Restraint

Chapter:
(p.241) 7 Judicial Review and Judicial Restraint
Source:
The Sovereignty of Law
Author(s):

T. R. S. Allan

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685066.003.0007

This chapter examines and rejects demands for a special doctrine of judicial deference to safeguard the legitimacy of judicial review. It contends that considerations of legitimacy and expertise are implicit constraints on review, inherent in the proper application of legal principle to particular cases. Distinctions drawn between contrasting standards of review, such as Wednesbury reasonableness and proportionality, are also questioned: they play a mainly descriptive rather than deliberative role. A judgement of rationality or irrationality is the conclusion of an analysis reflecting the constitutional context of executive action. Procedure shades in practice into substance as courts uphold requisite standards of due process (protecting both common law and European Convention rights). The ‘principle of legality’ is reinterpreted as a requirement of respect for the rule of law, which prohibits unjustified or disproportionate interference with fundamental rights. No statute can be correctly read as permitting such interference.

Keywords:   judicial deference, standards of review, Wednesbury reasonableness, rationality, proportionality, due process, common law rights, European Convention rights, principle of legality

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .