Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Courts and ConsociationsHuman Rights versus Power-Sharing$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Christopher McCrudden and Brendan O'Leary

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199676842

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676842.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 15 December 2019

The Bosnian Constitutional Court and consociation

The Bosnian Constitutional Court and consociation

Chapter:
(p.85) 6 The Bosnian Constitutional Court and consociation
Source:
Courts and Consociations
Author(s):

Christopher McCrudden

Brendan O’Leary

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676842.003.0006

This chapter examines the decisions of the Bosnian Constitutional Court. It considers the role of the Constitutinal Court; the Constituent Peoples case; the Court's decision on challenges to presidential election arrangements; and the views of international judges. It shows that the Constitutional Court of Bosnia, including some of its distinguished non-Bosnian members appointed by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), has often acted in line with the hypotheses of Issacaroff and Pildes. Its majorities have generally upheld consociational principles at the state level, respecting the constitution made at Dayton, even when ECtHR rights have arguably been limited. The track record of this Court, at least in key cases, also suggests a distinct pattern of judgment among the judges appointed from Bosnia. Bosniak judges have been more likely to favour integrationist constructions of the constitution and to express such commitments in their opinions. By contrast, the Serb and Croat judges have been more likely to uphold provisions emphasizing the multinational, federal, and consociational character of the constitution negotiated at Dayton.

Keywords:   constitutional courts, constituent peoples, presidential elections, international judges, consociational principle, human rights

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .