Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Beyond DisagreementOpen Remedies in Human Rights Adjudication$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Aruna Sathanapally

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199669301

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669301.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 18 November 2019

Epilogue

Epilogue

Chapter:
(p.213) 9 Epilogue
Source:
Beyond Disagreement
Author(s):

Aruna Sathanapally

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669301.003.0010

This chapter examines developments after the period of the empirical study, and during the early period of a new government. It analyses the impact of a significant change in the political landscape on outstanding DOIs and outstanding human rights concerns, arguing that the dominant dynamic between courts and legislatures over DOIs has not departed from the specialisation model of interaction. It includes analysis of the first parliamentary debate dedicated to open disagreement with a judicial finding of incompatibility; a House of Commons motion relating to the ban on prisoner voting.

Keywords:   coalition government, United Kingdom Bill of Rights, commission, backbencher motion, prisoner voting, sex offenders register

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .