Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Ontology after Carnap$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Stephan Blatti and Sandra Lapointe

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780199661985

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661985.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 14 November 2019

Carnap, the Necessary A Posteriori, and Metaphysical Anti-realism

Carnap, the Necessary A Posteriori, and Metaphysical Anti-realism

Chapter:
(p.81) 4 Carnap, the Necessary A Posteriori, and Metaphysical Anti-realism
Source:
Ontology after Carnap
Author(s):

Stephen Biggs

Jessica Wilson

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661985.003.0005

In Meaning and Necessity, Carnap advances an intensional semantic framework on which modal claims are knowable a priori, since true in virtue of semantic rules alone. In ‘Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology’, Carnap advances an epistemic-ontological framework on which metaphysical claims are either trivial or meaningless, since lacking any means of substantial confirmation. Carnap carried out these projects before Kripke influentially argued that some modal claims are only knowable a posteriori. How should a neo-Carnapian respond to Kripke’s results? Some have suggested (notably Chalmers and Jackson 2001) that extending intensional semantics as per “epistemic two-dimensionalism” can accommodate Kripke’s results while largely preserving Carnap’s commitment to the a priority of modal claims. This chapter considers how best to implement this suggestion and how the resulting semantics fits with Carnap’s second project. It finds that the most promising (and most Carnapian!) post-Kripke version of Carnap’s semantics presupposes an epistemology which undermines Carnap’s metaphysical anti-realism.

Keywords:   Carnap, Kripke, modality, necessity, a priority, a posteriori necessity, abduction, conceivability, two-dimensional semantics, metaphysical anti-realism, ontological anti-realism, abductive two-dimensionalism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .