Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
European Law and New Health Technologies$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mark L Flear, Anne-Maree Farrell, Tamara K Hervey, and Thérèse Murphy

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199659210

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659210.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 15 November 2019

Taking Technology Seriously: STS as a Human Rights Method

Taking Technology Seriously: STS as a Human Rights Method

Chapter:
(p.284) (p.285) 13 Taking Technology Seriously: STS as a Human Rights Method
Source:
European Law and New Health Technologies
Author(s):

Thérèse Murphy

Gearóid Ó Cuinn

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659210.003.0013

Science and technology studies (STS) is a relatively young academic field that has developed from the 1970s onwards. Today it encompasses a range of scholarly perspectives and, as a result, a range of methods and organizing ideas — including both Sheila Jasanoff's empirical comparative work around concepts such as co-production, sociotechnical imaginaries, and bioconstitutionalism, and Bruno Latour's actor-network theory. This chapter analyzes STS as a human rights method. It takes two new-health-technology cases from the European Court of Human Rights, and sets about reading them in two different ways — in one particular law way, and in the style of STS. It argues that reading cases with STS was surprisingly enabling. Critics argue that human rights lawyers spend too much time on rights as law, that they have cabined rights in a ‘juridical cage’. Other critics argue that both lawyer and non-lawyer alike spend too much time on rights; that even those who oppose rights engage in rights talk by seeking to draw boundaries between what is and what is not a legally-protected right. Reading the two cases with STS brings a fresh perspective to rights-as-law talk along with freedom from the standard-fare of law and limits.

Keywords:   science and technology studies, human rights, case law, new health technology

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .