Inferentialism about substantial self-knowledge says that theory-mediated inferences from internal promptings are an important source of substantial self-knowledge. This view can account for knowledge of one’s own character, values, and emotions. In all of these cases, inferentialism provides a plausible alternative to crude behaviourism about substantial self-knowledge. Inferentialism can be defended against Nussbaum’s charge that it is guilty of an unacceptable intellectualism in its account of self-knowledge of emotions such as love. In Nussbaum’s example from Proust, Marcel can infer that he loves Albertine from his anguish on hearing of her departure. Inferentialism does not imply that we are mere passive recorders of our own emotions, and can accommodate the role of insight in the acquisition of substantial self-knowledge. Literature and film are not sui generis sources of self-knowledge but aspects of our character and emotions, and values can be inferred from our reactions to novels and films.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.