Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Family-MakingContemporary Ethical Challenges$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Françoise Baylis and Carolyn McLeod

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780199656066

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: August 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199656066.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 18 October 2019

Analogies to Adoption in Arguments Against Anonymous Gamete Donation

Analogies to Adoption in Arguments Against Anonymous Gamete Donation

Geneticizing the Desire to Know

(p.239) 13 Analogies to Adoption in Arguments Against Anonymous Gamete Donation

Kimberly Leighton

Oxford University Press

In discussions of donor-assisted conception, a right to know one’s genetic ancestry has been invoked to capture the harm of anonymous gamete donation. Defenders of the view that someone who was donor-conceived has a “right to know” commonly invoke an analogy to adoption to support their argument. This chapter challenges the basic claim of the analogy: that adoption and its effects on adoptees can provide a “lesson” on how information should be handled in donor-assisted conception. The author questions the underlying assumption that the meaning of and desire for information in both cases is morally equivalent and criticizes how these arguments ultimately use adoption to show the value of genetic relatedness. The analogy they invoke geneticizes adoption by rendering what it means to know or not know one’s origins in adoption in specifically genetic terms. The consequences of this geneticization are harmful to adoptees and reflect the bionormative view that families should be genetically related.

Keywords:   adoption, analogy to adoption, anonymous gamete donation, assisted reproduction, bionormativity, bionormative concept of family, biologic bias, donor-assisted conception, ethics, genetic identity, geneticization, genetic origins, right to know

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .