Dharmakīrti, Dignāga's very influential successor, expands the discussion with an impressive analysis of nonconceptual perceptual content. This chapter argues that Dharmakīrti's account should be understood as a version of the so‐called relational theory of sentience, not as a sense‐data theory. Dharmakīrti uses the theory to address the binding problem: how are flows of sensation bound into thought about robust objects with determinate identity conditions? The same question for him arises for self‐consciousness: how are flows of reflexive self‐awareness bound into I‐thoughts, thought in which the self features as subject. The key insight is that reflexivity provides a principle by which to “tie” together the subject‐aspects of experiences in the content of self‐conscious states. This is an analogue for self‐consciousness of the role performed for Dharmakīrti by presented spatial location in solving the binding problem, presented spatial location being what ties together the object‐aspects in intentional experience. Dharmakīrti argues nevertheless that binding generates only “quasi‐objects” and “quasi‐subjects”, entities which lack full criteria of identity and for which the question “Is this the same object/subject as before?” cannot be answered.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.