Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Act and CrimeThe Philosophy of Action and its Implications for Criminal Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Michael S. Moore

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199599509

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599509.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 17 July 2019

The Doctrinal and Normative Basis of the Double-Jeopardy Requirement

The Doctrinal and Normative Basis of the Double-Jeopardy Requirement

Chapter:
(p.305) 12 The Doctrinal and Normative Basis of the Double-Jeopardy Requirement
Source:
Act and Crime
Author(s):

Michael S. Moore (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599509.003.0012

Anglo-American constitutional law prohibits a person from being twice put in jeopardy for ‘the same offense.’ In the United States this seemingly simple requirement has generated a doctrinal thicket about what is and what is not ‘the same offense,’ leading many legal theorists to give up on there being a coherent double jeopardy doctrine. This chapter seeks to bring order to this doctrinal thicket. It does so by: separating the several distinct prohibitions making up the double jeopardy ban; examining the policies behind such prohibitions; relating the extant legal tests for ‘same offense’ to each other and to such policies; separating the question of ‘same offense’ into two distinct questions, one about when two putatively distinct types of actions should be considered the same, and the other about when particular act-token(s) are one or several. These two questions are allocated, respectively, to the ‘overlapping statutes’ problem and to the ‘unit of offense’ problem.

Keywords:   double jeopardy, same offense, act-types, act-tokens, unit of offense, overlapping statutes

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .