What Can a Philosopher Tell You About Expertise?
The scientific research on expertise is flourishing. Is there a need for a philosophical account as well? After discussing some of the differences and similarities between philosophical and scientific inquiry, this chapter answers that question. It also explains the methodology employed throughout the book, which encompasses the principle that, barring any good reason for doubt, first-person accounts of one’s own mental processes can be accepted at face value, a principle that roughly follows from Tyler Burge’s “acceptance principle.” It also discusses the difficulty of achieving ecological validity when performing controlled experiments on experts, and provides and outline of the rest of the book.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.